![]() ![]() That may be because people don’t think of an occurrence on its own, but make a sentimental association with it.įor instance, when admiring the pot holder your child knitted for you at camp many years ago, the upswell of delight is less about the beauty of the pot holder than it is about the child who crafted it. They found that when people associate sentimental value with an event, the happiness they get from it remains more constant over time. In a 2015 analysis, researchers compared the results of seven studies. Your own sentimentality can even prolong feelings of happiness. If you’ve attained something that you value for its own sake, whether or not anyone else wants it, your satisfaction may be more likely to persist. Studies show that when you pursue something in part because other people have it, the happiness you experience wears off swiftly. Novelty also wears off fairly quickly, so if you’ve moved to a new city or taken a new job, you may feel an increase in happiness because you’re experiencing something new.īut, as you grow accustomed to your new situation, the feelings may subside somewhat.Īnother factor that can influence the duration of your feelings has to do with whether you compare yourself to others in seeking happiness. Sensory experiences - those that make you happy because they involve good physical sensations - and intensely emotional experiences both tend to be less durable than other satisfactions. Why some events are more prone to hedonic adaptation than others So, what makes an event more likely to lead to long-term happiness instead of effervescent pleasure? The pleasure or loss of pleasure can cause a long-term (possibly even permanent) change in personal happiness. People who divorce or are widowed are likely to be less happy for a long time afterward (again, generally speaking). Researchers also point out that some life experiences do, in fact, tend to promote lifelong shifts in emotional states.īroadly speaking, people who marry are likely to be happier over time than those who don’t. These measures are often open to individual interpretations. Many studies use surveys, interviews, and subjective scales to account for personal happiness. But some experts would add a note of caution.įor one thing, the definition of “happiness” is notoriously hazy, as is the definition of well-being, making it hard to compare studies - and human beings, for that matter. Some psychologists say as much as 50 percent of your capacity for happiness is inherited. These findings suggest that increasing hedonic and eudaimonic behaviours may be an effective way to increase well-being and reduce psychological distress.The hedonic treadmill is based on the idea that people generally return to a level of happiness that’s consistent with their personality and genetics. Both hedonic and eudaimonic behaviours predicted flourishing. Eudaimonic behaviour predicted meaning in life and elevating experience. Hedonic behaviour also predicted reduced negative affect, depression, and stress. Hedonic activity served an emotion regulation function, predicting positive affect, carefreeness, vitality, and life satisfaction. Participants spent more time engaged in hedonic activity than eudaimonic activity. Participants ( N = 105) completed an array of well-being outcomes prior to completing an online diary, reporting actual instances of hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour. Findings from such research lack practical relevance, and hence, this study aimed to investigate how actual hedonic and eudaimonic behaviour related to well-being and psychopathology. Past research in this area has predominantly focused on global cognitive evaluations of how one typically lives. Hedonia and eudaimonia have both been proposed as pathways to well-being. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |